Posted by: Petros | February 10, 2009

Matthew 18.15-20 in the light of the Dead Sea Scrolls by Peter Wallace Dunn

Matthew 18.15-20 in the light of the Dead Sea Scrolls (pdf), by Peter Wallace Dunn

A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Christian Studies at Regent College, April, 1991, under the supervision of Dr. (now Prof.) Markus N. A. Bockmuehl.

Abstract

The Dead Sea Scrolls provide some remarkable parallel texts to Matthew 18.15-20. In a recent article, F. Garcia Martinez shows that previous studies of these parallels are inadequate because they assume that a dependent relationship exists between Matthew 18.15-17 (as a tradition unit) and 1QS 5.24-6.1. He suggests that further investigation of these parallels would be helpful in understanding Matthew 18.15-17, as a tradition unit and in its literary context. This study seeks to do the latter–to compare and contrast Matthew 18.15-20 (the full unit) in its literary context with parallels from the DSS, in order to come to a better understanding of the correction process in the Matthean community.

Significant differences exist between the Matthean community and the Qumran community. The latter is rigidly hierarchical. It upholds a priestly level of purity within the community. In contrast, the Matthean community’s basic member is a “little one” and must not seek rank or title. Matthew’s Gospel stresses internal, not external purity. Although the communities of Qumran and Matthew have significant differences, they also have equally significant similarities. Both communities view themselves as living out the life of the Age to Come in the present wicked age. Thus, they both need a process of initiation and of correction, in order to distinguish who does and does not belong to the community.

There are three points of contact in the correction processes of the DSS and of Matthew. The first point of contact is the practice of rebuke. Both communities practice rebuke in accordance with Leviticus 19.18. The second point of contact is the use of the law of witnesses (Deut 19.15). Both Matthew and the DSS use witnesses in the correction process, though for different purposes. The third is their understanding of the consequences of correction–in some cases both the DSS and Matthew call for the expulsion of a member of the community. In both Matthew and the DSS, expulsion has eternal implications.


Responses

  1. […] of the Dead Sea.  Geza Vermes wrote (The Dead Sea Scrolls:  Qumran in Perspective, 1977, p. 130; see my master’s thesis p. […]

  2. […] Christian community could do to help a wayward brother was to withdraw from him, advice based on Matthew 18.15-20 the subject of my Regent College MCS thesis which I had just completed.  So they asked him to leave.  But before he left, Sheldon learned […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: